Coornhert
feee871c31
40.566 regelingen geparsed van BWB XML naar Markdown + YAML frontmatter. Bron: repository.officiele-overheidspublicaties.nl via SRU zoekservice. Verdeling per type: - 21.167 ministeriële regelingen - 4.605 ZBO-regelingen - 3.678 verdragen - 3.631 AMvB's - 3.179 wetten - 2.564 PBO-regelingen - 883 KB's - 591 circulaires - 150 beleidsregels - 118 rijkswetten 0 parse failures. 110.531 SRU records verwerkt.
4.3 KiB
| titel | bwb_id | type | status | datum_inwerkingtreding | bron | citeertitel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protocol bij het Verdrag ter bestrijding van de valsemunterij | BWBV0006243 | verdrag | geldend | 1932-07-29 | https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBV0006243 | Protocol bij het Verdrag ter bestrijding van de valsemunterij |
Protocol bij het Verdrag ter bestrijding van de valsemunterij
Artikel I
At the moment of signing the Convention of this day's date, the undersigned Plenipotentiaries declare that they accept the interpretations of the various provisions of the Convention set out hereunder.
It is understood:
(1) (1) That the falsification of a stamp on a note, when the effect of such a stamp is to make that note valid in a given country, shall be regarded as a falsification of the note. (2) (2) That the Convention does not affect the right of the High Contracting Parties freely to regulate, according to their domestic law, the principles on which a lighter sentence or no sentence may be imposed, the prerogative of pardon or mercy and the right to amnesty. (3) (3) That the rule contained in Article 4 of the Convention in no way modifies internal regulations establishing penalties in the event of concurrent offences. It does not prevent the same individual, who is both forger and utterer, from being prosecuted as forger only. (4) (4) That High Contracting Parties are required to execute letters of request only within the limits provided for by their domestic law.
Artikel II
The High Contracting Parties who make the reservations set forth hereunder make their acceptance of the Convention conditional on the said reservations; their participation, subject to the said reservations, is accepted by the other High Contracting Parties.
(1) (1) The Government of India make a reservation to the effect that Article 9 does not apply to India, where the power to legislate is not sufficiently extensive to admit of the legislation contemplated by this article. (2) (2) Pending the negotiation for the abolition of consular jurisdiction which is still enjoyed by nationals of some Powers, the Chinese Government is unable to accept Article 10, which involves the general undertaking of a Government to grant extradition of a foreigner who is accused of counterfeiting currency by a third State. (3) (3) As regards the provisions of Article 20, the delegation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics reserves for its Government the right to address, if it so desires, the instrument of its ratification to another signatory State in order that the latter may transmit a copy thereof to the Secretary-General of the League of Nations for notification to all the signatory or acceding States.
Artikel III
At the moment of signing the Convention, the representative of Switzerland made the following declaration:
„The Swiss Federal Council, being unable to assume any obligation as to the penal clauses of the Convention before the question of the introduction of a unified penal code in Switzerland is settled in the affirmative, draws attention to the fact that the ratification of the Convention cannot be accomplished in a fixed time.
„Nevertheless, the Federal Council is disposed to put into execution, to the extent of its authority, the administrative provisions of the Convention whenever these will come into force in accordance with Article 25.”
At the moment of signing the Convention, the representative of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics made the following declaration:
„The delegation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, while accepting the provisions of Article 19, declares that the Government of the Union does not propose to have recourse, in so far as it is concerned, to the jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of International Justice.
„As regards the provision in the same Article by which disputes which it has not been possible to settle by direct negotiations would be submitted to any other arbitral procedure than that of the Permanent Court of International Justice, the delegation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics expressly declares that acceptance of this provision must not be interpreted as modifying the point of view of the Government of the Union on the general question of arbitration as a means of settling disputes between States.”